2024 Medical Professional Liability: An Evolving Landscape

Executive Summary

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of medical professional liability, focusing on the comparative risk profiles, legal dynamics, and financial costs for Advanced Practice Providers (APPs), including Nurse Practitioners (NPs) and Physician Assistants (PAs), and their physician counterparts. The analysis is framed within the context of a rapidly evolving healthcare landscape marked by rising litigation and unprecedented jury verdicts.

The findings indicate that while APPs are demonstrably involved in fewer malpractice reports and incur lower average payouts compared to physicians, their liability risk is increasing as their roles and clinical autonomy expand. A significant majority of malpractice claims involving APPs also name a supervising or collaborating physician as a co-defendant, revealing a complex legal framework of shared liability.¹ A study on full practice authority (FPA) for NPs found no increase in malpractice payouts against them, but a decrease in payouts against physicians, suggesting a positive legal separation that benefits both parties.³

Financially, the cost of professional liability insurance is tiered by provider type and specialty. NPs and PAs pay an average of $800 to $2,200 annually, whereas physician premiums average $7,500 but can exceed $200,000 for high-risk specialties.⁴ This cost disparity directly reflects the differences in claims frequency and severity. A deeper examination of claims reveals that diagnostic errors are a disproportionately frequent allegation against APPs, comprising over 40% of claims.⁷ Recommendations for mitigating risk across all provider types include enhancing documentation practices, strengthening inter-provider communication, and securing appropriate individual liability insurance.

The Leading Clinical Diagnoses in Malpractice Litigation

The complexity of medical malpractice litigation makes a simple “top 20” list insufficient for a nuanced understanding. Instead, this analysis presents a thematic breakdown of the most frequent and costly clinical diagnoses and the corresponding errors. These diagnoses, while distinct, often share a common thread: a breakdown in clinical judgment, communication, or established protocols.

Diagnostic Failures: The Most Common and Foundational Claims

Diagnostic error is not merely a single mistake but a gateway that frequently leads to a cascade of subsequent liability. The data confirms this category as the single most common cause of medical malpractice lawsuits.⁷ A staggering one-third (33%) of all filed malpractice claims are related to missed or delayed diagnoses.⁹ In some specialties, this figure is even higher, with diagnostic failures accounting for 47% of internal medicine claims and 58% of all claims in emergency medicine.¹⁰

A misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis can have catastrophic consequences, including a patient receiving no treatment, inappropriate treatment, or a worsening of their condition.¹¹ The legal standard of care requires proving a deviation from what a “reasonably competent physician” would have done under similar circumstances.¹¹ However, the root cause of these errors is often not a simple lack of medical knowledge but rather a breakdown in systemic processes. Common contributing factors include mislabeled or lost lab results, poor communication between providers, and a failure to order necessary tests.⁹

The legal and professional landscape pressures physicians to practice “defensive medicine”—ordering a battery of diagnostic tests solely to protect against potential malpractice claims.¹⁵ This practice, estimated to cost the healthcare system tens of billions of dollars annually, is often an inefficient substitute for sound clinical judgment and meticulous documentation. The most effective defense is not an exhaustive list of tests but rather a detailed, documented record of the differential diagnosis process, demonstrating a logical and evidence-based pathway to the final diagnosis.¹⁷

The top 20 list

The following are twenty high-impact diagnoses and conditions frequently cited in malpractice lawsuits, with a focus on areas relevant to primary care, urgent care, emergency medicine, and hospitalist/acute care:

1. Delayed or Missed Cancer Diagnosis: Timely diagnosis and intervention are critical to favorable patient outcomes, making a failure to diagnose cancer a common and high-value claim.¹¹
2. Delayed or Missed Stroke Diagnosis: Especially in emergency and urgent care settings, a failure to identify the symptoms of a stroke can lead to irreversible neurological damage.²²
3. Delayed or Missed Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) Diagnosis: This is a classic, high-stakes diagnostic failure, frequently cited in Emergency Department lawsuits.¹¹
4. Failure to Diagnose Sepsis: A rapidly progressing, life-threatening condition that, if missed, is a recurring theme in hospital and acute care claims.²⁵
5. Delayed or Missed Appendicitis Diagnosis: This is a significant issue, particularly in pediatric patients, where the condition is misdiagnosed in up to 57% of cases.¹¹
6. Delayed or Missed Meningitis Diagnosis: Cited as a common diagnostic failure, particularly in children.¹¹
7. Failure to Diagnose Aortic Aneurysm/Dissection: A high-mortality diagnosis often missed in the high-pressure environment of the Emergency Department.²³
8. Failure to Diagnose Pulmonary Embolism: Another high-acuity condition often cited in diagnostic error lawsuits.²³
9. Failure to Diagnose a Related Disease: This error occurs when a provider correctly diagnoses a primary condition but fails to identify a related or co-morbid condition.²⁶
10. Delayed or Missed Spinal Cord Compression/Injury Diagnosis: A failure to recognize the signs and symptoms of a spinal cord injury, which can lead to permanent damage.²²
11. Delayed or Missed Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Diagnosis: A diagnostic failure that can result in a pulmonary embolism.²²
12. Improper Patient Assessment: A common error in malpractice claims, particularly in ambulatory settings, involving inadequate history-taking or physical examinations.¹⁶
13. Inadequate Patient Monitoring or “Failure to Rescue”: This is a key issue in inpatient settings where providers fail to recognize a patient’s worsening condition in a timely manner.¹⁶
14. Failure to Perform a Timely C-Section: The most prominent cause of severe birth injuries due to fetal distress that is related to emergency medicine care.²⁸
15. Incorrect Dosage or Wrong Medication: The most common medication error, involving instances of administering too much or too little of a drug.⁹
16. Failure to Check for Drug Interactions or Allergies: A failure to consider a patient’s complete medical and medication history, leading to dangerous adverse reactions.⁹
17. Anesthesia Errors: A specialized, high-risk category of procedural and monitoring errors, including mistakes in administration, monitoring, or intubation.⁹
18. Surgical or Procedural Errors: Including errors such as operating on the wrong site, performing an incorrect procedure, or leaving a foreign object inside a patient.²⁰
19. Improper Discharge: Releasing a patient from the hospital or clinic before they have received the necessary care or without providing proper follow-up instructions.⁹
20. Failure to Refer to a Specialist: A significant issue in primary care where a patient’s condition is beyond the scope of the provider’s expertise and a timely referral is not made.⁹

Advanced Practice Providers and Malpractice: A Growing Area of Liability

The increasing role of advanced practice providers (APPs), such as nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs), has brought them into the spotlight of medical malpractice litigation. While their risk exposure is generally lower than that of physicians, they are not immune to claims, and their legal liability is a key consideration for practices employing them.

The incidence of malpractice claims against PAs and NPs is significantly lower than that against physicians.⁷ From 2005 to 2014, there were between 11.2 and 19.0 malpractice payment reports per 1,000 physicians, compared to 1.4-2.4 per 1,000 PAs and 1.1-1.4 per 1,000 NPs.⁸ However, in 2023, the National Practitioner Data Bank recorded an all-time high of 1,143 malpractice payment reports involving nurses or PAs, indicating an upward trend in reported claims.⁷

The Role of Collaborative Practice Agreements

While definitive national data is not available from sources like the National Practitioner Data Bank to confirm the percentage of APP cases that involve a collaborative practice agreement ³⁴, a strong proxy is the rate at which a physician is named as a co-defendant in a malpractice claim alongside an APP. Data from multiple studies confirms this high rate of shared liability. One study of NP claims found that in 55 of 67 claims (82%), a physician was named as a co-defendant.¹ Similarly, a broader analysis of 54,722 closed malpractice claims revealed that physicians were named as co-defendants in approximately 75% of cases that also named an APP.² This pattern is a reflection of the legal principle of vicarious liability, where a supervising or collaborating physician can be held legally responsible for the actions of the APP.⁷

Risk and Autonomy: Independent vs. Supervised Practice

The question of whether malpractice risk is higher for APPs who practice independently versus with a supervising physician is at the center of a national debate on scope-of-practice laws.³ Historically, the liability risk for APPs has been markedly lower than for physicians.⁸ The landscape is changing as a growing number of states grant full practice authority (FPA) to APPs, enabling them to diagnose, treat, and prescribe without a formal supervisory agreement. The American Medical Association and other physician groups have argued that this increased autonomy could lead to a rise in patient harm.³ However, a recent analysis of malpractice payouts in FPA states challenges this contention. A study found that allowing NPs to practice without physician supervision did not lead to any change in the number of malpractice payouts against them.³

A significant secondary finding from this research was that physician malpractice payout counts actually decreased after the implementation of FPA, indicating a favorable legal separation for physicians.³

The most common claims against APPs mirror those against physicians, with diagnostic errors being the most frequent allegation.⁷ From 2005 to 2014, diagnostic-related malpractice allegations were significantly more common for PAs (52.8%) and NPs (40.6%) than for physicians (31.9%).⁸ Medication errors, failure to refer, and poor documentation are also common claims.⁷ The outcomes for malpractice claims against APPs show that physician median payments were 1.3 to 2.3 times higher than those for PAs or NPs.⁸ However, the financial costs can still be significant, with one report noting the average cost of a malpractice claim for a nurse practitioner was $300,506.³⁸

Analysis of Malpractice Case Outcomes and Verdict Trends

While headlines frequently highlight multi-million dollar verdicts, the reality of medical malpractice litigation is far more complex. The vast majority of cases are resolved through settlement, a critical distinction that reveals much about the financial and risk-management strategies of healthcare providers and their insurers.

The High Rate of Settlement: A Critical Distinction

The data overwhelmingly indicates that over 96% of all medical malpractice claims are resolved out of court through a settlement with the provider’s malpractice insurance.³⁹ The National Practitioner Data Bank supports this, noting that 96.5% of all malpractice payouts in 2018 resulted from settlements rather than court judgments.¹⁰ For cases that proceed to a formal lawsuit, a 2006 Harvard study reported that 61% are still settled out of court.⁴⁰

This high settlement rate is not necessarily an admission of guilt but a sophisticated risk management strategy. Facing the unpredictability of a jury trial and the potential for a financially devastating “nuclear verdict,” defense attorneys and insurers often advise settling a case, even if it is highly defensible.⁴¹ Settling allows them to cap legal and indemnity costs, avoiding the potential for a multi-million dollar verdict that could exhaust insurance limits and cause long-term reputational damage. The average legal defense cost for a physician alone ranges from $50,000 to $100,000, making settlement a pragmatic financial calculation.⁴¹

The rising cost of claims is driven in part by a phenomenon known as “social inflation,” which describes the rising costs of claims due to changing societal expectations.¹⁵ Factors such as public distrust of large corporations, shifting jury demographics, and evolving plaintiff attorney strategies influence juries to award larger damages.¹⁵ This societal shift increases the perceived risk of a trial, thereby making settlements a more attractive option for defendants.

The Courtroom Verdict: A Rare But High-Stakes Event

When a case does proceed to a jury verdict, the defendant has a significant advantage. Plaintiffs win medical malpractice cases only about one-third of the time.⁴⁰ Other studies place the plaintiff win rate at 27% and 36.7%, confirming a trend of high defendant success.⁴⁰ This is a crucial data point for practitioners; while the process is stressful, the odds of a plaintiff winning at trial are significantly lower than in other tort cases.⁴⁰

However, the cases that do succeed can result in financially devastating outcomes. The trend of multi-million dollar “nuclear verdicts” (verdicts of $10 million or more) is continuing in 2024, with new records being set in states like New Mexico and Michigan.²⁹ These verdicts, though rare, exert upward pressure on malpractice premiums for all providers.⁴¹ The presence or absence of caps on non-economic damages has a direct impact on verdict size, with states that have relaxed or no caps being more likely to see these mega-verdicts.¹⁵

The available data on outcomes over the last 10 years indicates a downward trend in the percentage of cases closing with an indemnity payment. One report shows the percentage of cases with a payment falling from 61% to 52% between 2017 and mid-2023.²⁷

Table 1: A Summary of Medical Malpractice Claim Outcomes

Case Outcome	Percentage	Description
Claims Resolved by Settlement	>96% of all claims; 61% of lawsuits	The vast majority of malpractice claims are resolved out-of-court to mitigate the risk of a trial.39
Cases Proceeding to Verdict	A small minority of claims	The minority of cases that are not dropped or settled and proceed to trial.40
Plaintiff Win Rate at Verdict	27% to 36.7%	The defendant has a significant advantage in the courtroom, with plaintiffs winning only about one-third of the time.40
Average Payouts	Average negotiated settlement: $430,000; Verdicts often in the millions	While the average settlement is under $500,000, high-profile verdicts can reach into the hundreds of millions.44

Specialty-Specific Liability: A Correlative Analysis

The nature of malpractice risk varies significantly by specialty. The following analysis correlates the most common claims and diagnoses with the unique characteristics of different practice settings, providing a targeted risk profile for each.

Table 2: Malpractice Risk Profile by Clinical Specialty

Specialty	Relative Malpractice Frequency	Most Common Claim Categories	Top Diagnoses/Conditions in Lawsuits
Emergency Medicine	High Tier	Diagnostic failures (58%), procedural errors (25%), communication gaps	Missed stroke, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection, appendicitis, meningitis
Urgent Care Medicine	Medium Tier	Diagnostic failures, failure to refer, inadequate patient assessment	Missed stroke, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, appendicitis
Hospitalist/Acute Care	Low-Medium Tier	Diagnostic failures (e.g., “failure to rescue”), inadequate monitoring, communication breakdowns	Failure to diagnose sepsis, post-operative complications, premature discharge
Primary Care Medicine	Medium Tier	Diagnostic errors, failure to treat, failure to refer	Delayed cancer diagnosis, missed infection, failure to refer to a specialist

Emergency and Urgent Care Medicine

Emergency medicine is a high-risk specialty with a high frequency of lawsuits.²¹ Approximately one in every 14 emergency physicians is sued each year ⁴⁵, and 71% of them face at least one lawsuit during their career.²¹ The high-pressure, fast-paced nature of the Emergency Department makes it a high-acuity environment for diagnostic failures, which account for 58% of all claims in this specialty.¹⁰

Hospital Medicine and Acute Care

Hospitalists are in a low-medium frequency and severity tier for malpractice claims compared to other specialists.⁴⁶ However, the inpatient environment is a high-risk setting for certain types of claims. While diagnostic errors are a primary issue, the key correlation in this setting is the “failure to rescue”.¹⁶ This occurs when a provider fails to recognize a patient’s worsening condition or new complications in a timely manner. Liability in the inpatient setting is deeply correlated with systemic process breakdowns. The most common contributing factors are inadequate patient monitoring, insufficient documentation, and communication gaps between providers.¹⁶

Primary Care Medicine

While primary care providers may not face the same high-acuity risks as their emergency and hospitalist colleagues, they are not immune to liability. Primary care is considered a medium-frequency and medium-severity specialty for malpractice claims.⁴⁶ The most common mistakes made by primary care physicians involve diagnostic errors, including a delayed or inaccurate diagnosis.¹⁴ Other recurring claims include the failure to treat a patient’s condition, such as a failure to order necessary tests, monitor a patient’s condition, or provide a follow-up plan.⁹ A unique and significant correlation for this specialty is the failure to refer a patient to a specialist when their condition is beyond the scope of primary care. This is often a key point of negligence in a malpractice lawsuit.⁹

The Power of the Pen: Documentation as a Primary Defense

The data from this report repeatedly highlights that malpractice risk is less a function of a bad outcome and more a function of a broken process. While no amount of preparation can completely eliminate risk, a proactive approach to professional practice can dramatically reduce exposure to liability.

Documentation is a clinician’s most powerful defense. The data is clear: insufficient documentation makes a case 76% more likely to close with a payment.¹⁶ This extends beyond a quick note. Meticulous documentation means recording the entire diagnostic process—the differential diagnoses considered and how they were narrowed down—to demonstrate sound clinical judgment.¹⁸ Documenting that information was communicated to the patient and their family, including the risks and benefits of treatment, is also critically important and creates a defensible record of care.²⁵

A fully documented record, one that clearly communicates a patient’s history, the thought process, and follow-up plans, can often prevent a lawsuit from moving forward to trial.¹⁷ For example, documenting a differential diagnosis for a patient with non-specific abdominal pain, such as “likely gastroenteritis, appendicitis possible,” demonstrates an open-minded approach and a consideration of worst-case scenarios.¹⁷ Furthermore, documenting patient noncompliance with recommended tests or treatments, including the potential consequences, is a critical defense strategy.²⁵

Attorneys often scrutinize electronic medical records (EMRs) for signs of carelessness. Using “cut and paste” functions or unedited templates can give a jury the impression that the provider was sloppy or did not care enough to document personal impressions, making the case harder to defend.²⁵ A physician’s detailed, timely, and thorough charting is seen as evidence of a careful and caring physician who gave adequate thought to the case.²⁵

The Economics of Malpractice Insurance

The financial reality of malpractice risk is most clearly reflected in the cost of professional liability insurance. The premiums for APPs and physicians are not only different but exist on a completely different scale.

Malpractice Insurance Premiums by Provider Type and Specialty

The average annual cost of professional liability insurance for Nurse Practitioners ranges from $800 to $2,200.⁵ For Physician Assistants, the average is approximately $1,750 per year.⁶ In contrast, the average annual premium for a physician is approximately $7,500 ⁴, but this number is heavily misleading due to the vast differences in cost by specialty and location.

The cost of insurance is not uniform and is heavily influenced by a specialty’s risk profile, defined by the frequency and severity of malpractice claims.

Specialty	Average Annual Premium	Notes
Primary Care (Physicians)	$5,000 to $12,000	Can vary significantly by state; for example, a general practitioner in Charlotte, NC, might pay $15,000, while one in Manhattan, NY, could pay over $300,000.48
Emergency Medicine	$23,000 to $42,381	Hospitalist premiums are also high, ranging from $18,000 to $45,000 depending on the location.49
General Surgery	$30,000 to $50,000	Can reach upwards of $136,398 in high-cost areas like New York City.49
Obstetrics/Gynecology	Up to $226,224	The highest-cost specialty, especially in states with high litigation rates like Florida.4

The immense disparity in premiums is a direct consequence of the frequency and financial severity of claims. While NPs and PAs have historically faced a lower number of malpractice payments, physicians face a higher volume of claims that result in significantly larger payouts.⁸ The most financially devastating claims—birth injuries and surgical errors—are almost exclusively tied to physician specialties and can lead to multi-million dollar verdicts that drive up insurance costs for the entire field.²⁹

Conclusions & Recommendations

The trends outlined in this report—from the rise of nuclear verdicts driven by social inflation to the pervasive risk of diagnostic and communication failures—present an unprecedented challenge to modern healthcare providers. Malpractice litigation is not a lottery; it is an outcome often rooted in identifiable, preventable professional and systemic errors.

The most effective strategy for mitigating this risk is a commitment to continuous professional education that targets the root causes of liability. This means moving beyond theoretical knowledge to practical, actionable training in diagnostic reasoning, meticulous documentation, and high-stakes communication. In a legal and financial climate that increasingly punishes missteps, proactive education is the most powerful form of professional protection.

---

Mitigating Your Risk with Provider Practice Essentials, LLC

The trends outlined in this report present an unprecedented challenge to modern healthcare providers. While no amount of preparation can completely eliminate risk, a proactive approach to professional development can dramatically reduce your exposure.

Provider Practice Essentials, LLC, is your partner in this endeavor. Our programs are meticulously designed to address the specific root causes of liability identified in this report. We go beyond theoretical knowledge to provide practical, actionable training in:

• Advanced Diagnostic Reasoning: Our curriculum focuses on breaking down complex clinical presentations, building a comprehensive differential diagnosis, and systematically ruling out high-risk conditions—directly mitigating the most common cause of malpractice claims.
• Meticulous Documentation Strategies: We provide hands-on training on how to document not just the “what” but the “why,” creating an ironclad record of your clinical judgment and communication that is defensible in a court of law.
• High-Stakes Communication Skills: Our modules on inter-professional handoffs, patient communication, and delivering difficult news are specifically designed to close the communication gaps that are a recurring theme in adverse events and lawsuits.
• Standard of Care & Best Practices: We provide up-to-date, specialty-specific guidance on community standards of care, ensuring you are equipped to make decisions that are not only clinically sound but also legally defensible.

In a legal and financial climate that increasingly punishes missteps, proactive education is the most powerful form of professional protection. Don’t leave your practice to chance. Enroll in a Provider Practice Essentials, LLC, program today and transform your liability risk into a source of professional confidence and competence.

---

Sources and References

1. Aon/ASHRM Hospital and Physician Professional Liability Benchmark Report ⁵³
2. Anthem EAP – Medical Malpractice Common Errors by Doctors and Hospitals ³¹
3. Anthem EAP – Medical Malpractice Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis ¹¹
4. Bencrump.com – What Are the Most Common Medical Malpractice Claims? ⁹
5. Buckfire Law – Emergency Room Errors ²³
6. Consumershield.com – Medical Malpractice Payouts By State ⁴⁴
7. Disparti Law Group – 8 Common Emergency Room Errors ²²
8. Disparti Law – When Is a Diagnostic Error Medical Malpractice? ¹²
9. Duke Health – Medical Malpractice: Why Things Go Wrong ¹⁶
10. EMRA.org – Medical Malpractice ¹⁰
11. Expert Institute – The Biggest Medical Malpractice Verdicts of 2024 ²⁹
12. Hopkins Firm – Most Common Causes of Medical Malpractice Lawsuits? ³⁰
13. Knapp & Roberts – Medical Malpractice Statistics for 2024 ³⁹
14. Lapidus Law Firm – Medical Malpractice Headlines in Early 2024 ³²
15. Lawsuit Information Center – Illinois Malpractice Verdicts ⁵⁴
16. Mannarino & Brasfield – Can I Sue My Primary Care Doctor? ¹⁴
17. MedPro Group – Hospitalist Claims Data Analysis ⁴⁶
18. MedPro Group – Senior Care Claims Data Analysis ²⁷
19. Medscape Physicians and Malpractice Report 2024 ⁵⁵
20. MEDPLI.com – Medical Malpractice Trends to Watch in 2024 ⁴¹
21. MICA Insurance – Most Common Medical Malpractice Claims ²⁶
22. Miller & Zois – Information on Medication Errors ²¹
23. Miller & Zois – Medical Malpractice Statistics ²¹
24. Morris & James LLP – Top Verdicts in 2024 YTD ²⁸
25. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) – Medical Malpractice ²⁵
26. National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) Data Analysis Tool ³⁴
27. OSBar.org – Medical Malpractice ¹³
28. Physicians Insurers Association of America (Phyins) – MPL Update 2024 ¹⁵
29. RAND Institute for Civil Justice – Medical Malpractice Lawsuits: Not an Easy Windfall for Plaintiffs ⁴²
30. Searcy Law – Statistics Show Medical Malpractice Cases Are Not an Easy Windfall for Plaintiffs ⁴⁰
31. State of Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR) – 2024 Medical Malpractice Annual Report ⁵⁶
32. Wilson Law – What Is the Most Common Cause of Malpractice Suits Against Physicians? ²⁰
33. Montrossmillerlaw.com ⁵⁷
34. Aafp.org ¹⁷
35. My.clevelandclinic.org ¹⁸
36. Saem.org ¹⁹
37. Lawsuit-information-center.com ⁵⁴
38. Aapalm.org ³²
39. PubMed.gov ¹⁸
40. Yourerielawyers.com ³
41. Nso.com ³⁵
42. Bjs.ojp.gov
43. Expertinstitute.com ⁸
44. Pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ⁴⁴
45. Ct.gov ²¹
46. Westwood.insure
47. Medpli.com
48. Cunninghamgroupins.com
49. Physiciansthrive.com
50. Eralocums.com
51. Insureon.com
52. Gilmanbedigian.com
53. Nso.com ³⁵
54. Flbog.sip.ufl.edu ³⁰
55. Intercareins.com ³⁶
56. Aapa.org
57. Patientsatrisk.com
58. Cato.org ¹⁹
59. Patientsatrisk.com
60. Cunninghamgroupins.com
61. Berxi.com
62. Thenursingbeat.com
63. Thedoctors.com

---

(c) Provider Practice Essentials, LLC, All rights reserved.

Works cited

1. NURSE PRACTITIONER CLOSED CLAIMS STUDY – Self-Insurance …, accessed August 21, 2025, https://flbog.sip.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/TheDoctorsCompany-Presentation-Nurse-Practitioner-Closed-Claims-Study.pdf
2. Advanced Practice Providers See More Complex Patients, Sued More Often, accessed August 21, 2025, https://intercareins.com/advanced-practice-providers-see-more-complex-patients-sued-more-often/
3. Nurse Practitioner Scope of Practice and Patient Harm: Evidence from Medical Malpractice Payouts and Adverse Action Reports | Cato Institute, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.cato.org/research-briefs-economic-policy/nurse-practitioner-scope-practice-patient-harm-evidence-medical
4. The Current Cost of Medical Malpractice Insurance | Physicians Thrive, accessed August 21, 2025, https://physiciansthrive.com/malpractice-insurance/costs/
5. Nurse Practitioner Medical Malpractice Insurance – Cunningham Group, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.cunninghamgroupins.com/healthcare-professionals/nurse-practitioner-malpractice-insurance/
6. Physician Assistant Malpractice Insurance – Berxi, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.berxi.com/insurance/physician-assistant/
7. Hospital Negligence Lawyers Debunk Physician Assistant and Nurse Practitioner Malpractice Myths | Montross Miller, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.montrossmillerlaw.com/hospital-negligence-lawyers-debunk-physician-assistant-and-nurse-practitioner-malpractice-myths/
8. Physician Assistant and Nurse Practitioner Malpractice Trends – APALM, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.aapalm.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Brock-Nicholson-Hooker-Malpractice-Trends.pdf
9. What Are the Most Common Medical Malpractice Claims? – Ben Crump, accessed August 20, 2025, https://bencrump.com/faqs/what-are-the-most-common-medical-malpractice-claims/
10. Medical Malpractice EMRA, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.emra.org/books/advocacy-handbook/medical-malpractice
11. Medical Malpractice: Misdiagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis – SPARC Group LLC EAP, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.anthemeap.com/sparc/find-legal-support/resources/consumer-rights/legal-assist/medical-malpractice-misdiagnosis-and-delayed-diagnosis
12. When is a Diagnostic Error Medical Malpractice? – Disparti Law Group, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.dispartilaw.com/when-is-a-diagnostic-error-medical-malpractice/
13. Medical Malpractice – Oregon State Bar, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.osbar.org/public/legalinfo/1276_MedicalMalpractice.htm
14. Can I Sue My Primary Care Doctor for Medical Malpractice? | Rockford Medical Negligence Lawyers – Attorney, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.mannarinoandbrasfield.com/blog/can-i-sue-my-primary-care-doctor-for-medical-malpractice
15. Medical Liability Insurance Industry Update 2024, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.phyins.com/MPLupdate2024
16. Medical Malpractice: Why Things Go Wrong | Duke Health Referring Physicians, accessed August 20, 2025, https://physicians.dukehealth.org/articles/medical-malpractice-why-things-go-wrong
17. Documentation Tips for Reducing Malpractice Risk – AAFP, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.aafp.org/pubs/fpm/issues/2000/0300/p29.html
18. Differential Diagnosis: Definition and Examples – Cleveland Clinic, accessed August 21, 2025, https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/22327-differential-diagnosis
19. Developing a Case-Specific Differential Diagnosis – SAEM, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.saem.org/about-saem/academies-interest-groups-affiliates2/cdem/for-students/online-education/m3-curriculum/group-focused-chief-complaint-history-physical-examination-and-differential-diagnosis/developing-a-case-specific-differential-diagnosis
20. Most Common Cause of Malpractice Suits Against Physicians, accessed August 20, 2025, https://wilsonlaw.com/blog/what-is-the-most-common-cause-of-malpractice-suits-against-physicians/
21. Medical Malpractice Statistics 2025 – Maryland Personal Injury Lawyer, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.millerandzois.com/medical-malpractice/medical-malpractice-statistics/
22. 8 Common Emergency Room Errors | Medical Malpractice – Disparti Law Group, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.dispartilaw.com/8-common-emergency-room-errors/
23. Michigan Emergency Room Error Lawyer | ER Malpractice Lawsuit | Sue – Buckfire Law, accessed August 20, 2025, https://buckfirelaw.com/case-types/medical-malpractice/emergency-room-errors/
24. Documenting High-Risk Cases to Avoid Malpractice Liability – AAFP, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.aafp.org/pubs/fpm/issues/2000/1000/p33.html
25. Medical Malpractice – StatPearls – NCBI Bookshelf, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470573/
26. Most Common Medical Malpractice Claims – MICA – Mutual Insurance Company of Arizona, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.mica-insurance.com/most-common-medical-malpractice-claims/
27. Senior Care – MedPro Group, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.medpro.com/documents/10502/5086245/Senior+Care_Claims+Data+Analysis_2024_MedPro+Group.pdf
28. Medical Malpractice – Top Verdicts in 2024 YTD – Morris James LLP, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.morrisjames.com/p/102jm2u/medical-malpractice-top-verdicts-in-2024-ytd/
29. The Biggest Medical Malpractice Verdicts of 2024 – Expert Institute, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.expertinstitute.com/resources/insights/top-medical-malpractice-verdicts/
30. What are the Most Common Causes of Medical Malpractice Lawsuits? | Millions Recovered, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.hopkinsfirm.com/faqs/what-are-the-most-common-causes-of-medical-malpractice-lawsuits/
31. Medical Malpractice: Common Errors by Doctors and Hospitals – Regional Employer/Employee Partnership EAP | Anthem, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.anthemeap.com/reep/find-legal-support/resources/consumer-rights/legal-assist/medical-malpractice-common-errors-by-doctors-and-hospitals
32. Medical Malpractice Headlines in Early 2024 | Lapidus Law Firm, accessed August 20, 2025, https://lapiduslawfirm.com/medical-malpractice-headlines-in-early-2024/
33. Physician Assistant and Nurse Practitioner Malpractice Trends – PubMed, accessed August 21, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27457425/
34. Data Analysis Tool – The NPDB, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.npdb.hrsa.gov/analysistool/
35. Nurse Practitioners in Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Cases, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.yourerielawyers.com/blog/nurse-practitioners-in-pennsylvania-medical-malpractice-cases/
36. Seven Dos and Don’ts of Medical Malpractice Insurance for RNs, NPs and PAs, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.thenursingbeat.com/articles/7-dos-and-donts-of-medical-malpractice-insurance-for-rns-nps-and-pas-2
37. Malpractice Risk | Patients at Risk, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.patientsatrisk.com/malpractice-justice
38. Surprising Findings from the Nurse Practitioners Claim Report | NSO, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.nso.com/Learning/Artifacts/Articles/10-most-surprising-things-from-the-NP-claim-report
39. Medical Malpractice Statistics for 2024 | Knapp & Roberts, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.knappandroberts.com/medical-malpractice-statistics-for-2024/
40. Statistics Show Medical Malpractice Cases Are Not … – Searcy Denney, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.searcylaw.com/wp-content/themes/paperstreet/files/Statistics%20Show%20Medical%20Malpractice%20Cases%20Are%20Not%20an%20Easy%20Windfall%20for%20Plaintiffs.pdf
41. Medical Malpractice Trends to Watch in 2024 – MEDPLI, accessed August 20, 2025, https://medpli.com/medical-malpractice-trends-2024/
42. Trends in Civil Jury Verdicts: New Data from 15 Jurisdictions | RAND, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9025.html
43. Medical Malpractice Trials and Verdicts in Large Counties, 2001, accessed August 21, 2025, https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/medical-malpractice-trials-and-verdicts-large-counties-2001
44. Medical Malpractice Payouts By State (2025) – ConsumerShield, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.consumershield.com/articles/medical-malpractice-payouts-by-state
45. www.emra.org, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.emra.org/books/advocacy-handbook/medical-malpractice#:~:text=Emergency%20medicine%20is%20a%20high,physicians%20getting%20sued%20each%20year.
46. Medical Hospitalist – Claims Data Snapshot – MedPro Group, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.medpro.com/documents/10502/5086243/Hospitalist.pdf
47. How Much Is Malpractice Insurance for Physicians in 2025? – Era Locums, accessed August 21, 2025, https://eralocums.com/blog/how-much-is-malpractice-insurance/
48. Physicians and Doctors Malpractice Insurance Cost Explained – Westwood Insurance Group, accessed August 21, 2025, https://westwood.insure/insurance-for-physicians/physicians-malpractice-insurance-cost/
49. The True Cost of Medical Malpractice Insurance for Physicians, accessed August 21, 2025, https://griffitheharris.com/how-much-do-doctors-pay-for-medical-malpractice-insurance/
50. Hospitalist Malpractice Insurance | Get a Quote – MEDPLI, accessed August 21, 2025, https://medpli.com/specialties/hospitalist-medical-malpractice-insurance/
51. 2025 Massachusetts Malpractice Insurance Buying Guide | Get Quote – MEDPLI, accessed August 21, 2025, https://medpli.com/massachusetts-doctors-buying-guide-to-medical-malpractice-insurance/
52. Medical Malpractice Insurance Cost: Fast & Free Quotes | Insureon, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.insureon.com/small-business-insurance/medical-malpractice/cost
53. Aon/ASHRM Hospital and Physician Professional Liability Benchmark Report, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.ashrm.org/aon-ashrm-hospital-and-physician-professional-liability-benchmark-report
54. Illinois Malpractice Settlement Amounts and Law – Lawsuit Information Center, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.lawsuit-information-center.com/illinois-malpractice-verdicts-malpractice-settlement-value.html
55. The Rising Price of Risk Management: Medscape Physicians and Malpractice Report 2024, accessed August 20, 2025, https://www.medscape.com/slideshow/2024-malpractice-report-6017673
56. 2024 Medical Malpractice Annual Report, accessed August 20, 2025, https://floir.com/property-casualty/professional-liability-insurance/docs-sf/default-source/property-and-casualty/medical-malpractice-closed-claim-database-and-rate-filing-annual-report/october-1-2024-medical-malpractice-report-(1)
57. Malpractice Insurance Basics – AAPA, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.aapa.org/career-central/practice-tools/malpractice-insurance-basics/
58. Twenty Years of Evidence on the Outcomes of Malpractice Claims – PMC, accessed August 21, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2628515/
59. NPs and PAs: What’s the malpractice risk? – Medical Economics, accessed August 21, 2025, https://www.medicaleconomics.com/view/nps-and-pas-whats-malpractice-risk

CT Medical Malpractice Report – June 2025, accessed August 21, 2025, https://portal.ct.gov/cid/-/media/cid/reports/medical-malpractice-report/2025-ct-medical-malpractice-report.pdf?rev=6a19113fbea2484abbdca3bdac6c6b2b

Safe Practice shouldn’t be taken for granted. If your are new to your role, changing specialites, or just want to learn more in a fun, non-judgemental, and interactive setting, join is for our AWESOME LIVE WORKSHOPS!